Pennsylvania Election Overview: November 2, 2010

Tuesday, November 2nd 2010 is the “midterm” general election throughout the United States. “midterm” refers to the gubernatorial election cycle which follows the presidential election by two years, and is viewed as a referendum on the American President’s job performance. President Barack Obama (D) has spent his first two years in office mired in a recession, with record unemployment and the 7th year of a costly US and NATO-led War on Terror in Iraq and Afghanistan. The President’s approval rating has risen in the past month by 5% to a 50% approval rating , it is yet to be determined whether riding Obama’s coat-tails will be a help or hinderance.

The purpose of this article is to share with you information and resources about the election, the candidates and the issues.  

Pennsylvania Races:  2010 is a tremendous election year for Pennsylvania as well. On Tuesday, Pennsylvanians will elect a new Governor and Lieutenant Governor, 26 of 50 State Senators, all 203 State Representatives, all 19 of its Congressional seats, and one of two US Senators. At stake is nothing less than majority control in Harrisburg and perhaps in Washington too. At the top of ticket, Pennsylvania is a battleground for the US Senate seat formerly held by long-time Senator Arlen Specter. The two candidates are Joe Sestak (D) and Pat Toomey (R) and by most accounts, are racing neck-and-neck. The latest Rasmussen poll (10/29/10) shows Republican candidate Pat Toomey leading Democrat Congressman Joe Sestak by 4 points (R50% to D46%). Last week‘s poll was similar (R48% to D46%) This race is still a toss-up and may simply come down to voter turnout. As of last week, some 2.5 million American already cast their vote.

US Senate Races: Nationwide, some 37 US Senate, seats are up for grabs. The latest Rasmussen poll shows Democrats retaining at least 48 Senate seats, Republicans at least 45, and 7 seats are considered toss-ups, including California, Colorado, Illinois, Nevada, PENNSYLVANIA, Washington, and West Virginia.

State Gubernatorial Races: 37 States will elect governors in this election too. The latest Rasmussen poll shows Democrats retaining 12 Governors, Republicans 28, independents 1 and 9 races are still toss-ups. Pennsylvania Governor’s race is “Leaning Republican”, but the expectation is that Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania’s current Attorney General will win handedly.

US House Races: Elections for all 435 United States House of Representatives elections will be held on Tuesday, representing all 50 US states, delegates from the District of Columbia and delegates of four of the five major US territories. Winners of this election cycle will serve in the 112th Congress which begins in January. 37 U.S. Representatives will retire at the end of their current term and 5 vacancies were filled earlier this year by special elections.  With 255 Democrat seats, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is the current Speaker of the House. With 178 seats, John Boehner (R-OH) is the Republican House Minority Leader. The party in the White House typically loses Congressional seats in a midterm election year anyway, and given the state of the economy, there is no reason to expect differently this year. Balance of power in the US House of Representatives might shift to the Republicans. Congressional Quarterly is projecting Democrats will gain at least 195 seats, Republicans at least 203. But with 37 seats too close to call, majority hangs in the balance. The Cook Political Report however, (10/26/10) raised its House forecast to “a Democratic net loss of 48 to 60 seats, with higher losses possible.” According to Cook, PA-3 Dahlkemper (D) Leans R; PA-4 Altmire (D) Leans D; PA-6 Gerlach (R) Likely R; PA-7 (Sestak) (D) [Sestak did not run for re-election but his seat is hotly contested] Leans R; PA-8 P. Murphy (D) is still a Tossup; PA-10 Carney (D) is a Tossup; PA-11 Kanjorski (D) is still a Tossup; PA-12 Critz (D) Leans D; PA-13 Schwartz (D) Solid D; PA-15 Dent (R) Likely R; PA-17 Holden (D) Likely D.  In total, 160 Republican seats and 122 Democrat seats are considered safe.

Here are the issues and endorsements of the top 2 PA Candidates for US Senate and PA Governor: 

Sestak:  Issues for US Senate Candidate Joe Sestak (D) include the Economy, HealthEducationEnergy and EnvironmentDefenseAgricultureAnimals and WildlifeEthicsGender EqualityHousingInternet and BroadbandIsraelLaborLGBTSeniorsSmall BusinessTransportationVeteransYouth, and Working Families. Sestak’s newspaper endorsements include the The Philadelphia Inquirer, ; The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, ; Philadelphia Daily News, ; The Harrisburg Patriot-NewsWilkes-Barre Times Leader, Erie Times-NewsWashington Observer-ReporterScranton Times-TribuneYork Daily Record.

Toomey: Issues for US Senate Candidate Pat Toomey(R) include: VeteransIsraelJobs & Economy, BailoutsTaxes, ; SpendingHealthcare, ImmigrationFamily & MarriageSecond AmendmentEnergy & Resources and National Security. You can also read some of these issues on Toomey’s blog. Toomey’s newspaper endorsements are hidden somewhere on his webpage. I challenge you to find them.

Corbett: Issues for Candidate for PA Governor Tom Corbett (R ) are found in his “50 ways to Rebuild PA”. and his positions on human services generally. Corbett’s Newspaper endorsements include, The Patriot News (Harrisburg, PA), The Tribune-Review (Pittsburgh, PA), The Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA), The Sun Gazette (Williamsport , PA), The Altoona Mirror (Altoona, PA), The Lancaster New Era (Lancaster, PA), The Sentinel (Lewistown, PA), The Times Leader (Wilkes-Barre, PA), The Times Observer (Warren, PA), The Daily Item (Sunbury, PA), The Indiana Gazette (Indiana, PA), The Bucks County Courier Times (Bucks County, PA) and numerous associations and elected officials.  Corbett’s Lieutenant Governor would be Jim Cawley.  

Onorato: Issues for Candidate for PA Governor Dan Onorato (D) are found in his “New Vision for Pennsylvania’s Future”, or go to the website for  specific positions like Jobs & the EconomyGovernment ReformEnergy & EnvironmentHealthcare, ; Pre-K – 12 EducationHigher EducationStrong CommunitiesPublic SafetyAgricultureSeniorsDisabilities and Arts & Culture.  Read excerpts of Onorato’s newspaper endorsements. The complete list of editorials is as follows: Delaware County Daily TimesDoylestown Intelligencer, Easton Express-Times; El Hispano (No link), Erie Times-News, Johnstown Tribune-Democrat, Penn State Daily Collegian, Philadelphia Daily News; Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Tribune, Pittsburgh Courier, Pocono Record, Scranton Times-Tribune, Tri-County / Courier-Express / Leader VindicatorUniontown Herald-Standard, Washington Observer-ReporterYork Daily Record. Onorato’s Lieutenant Governor would be Scott Conklin.

Here are three candidate questionnaires to shed light on the where the candidates stand on the issues.

Common Cause PA:  On October 11, Common Cause of Pennsylvania asked PA Gubernatorial and US Senate candidates to identify their top three government reform goals and where government reform stands among the candidate’s overall priorities. Gubernatorial candidates Tom Corbett (R) and Dan Onorato (D) were asked specific questions on a lobbyist gift ban for executive branch employees, campaign contribution limits, disclosure of independent campaign expenditures, the state campaign finance database, WAMs, whistleblower protection, a constitutional convention, and a special legislative session on government reform. Read Tom Corbett’s response and Dan Onorato’s response.  US Senate candidates Joe Sestak (D) and Pat Toomey (R) were asked about their top reform priorities, such as public financing of congressional elections, disclosure of independent expenditure campaigns, changing the filibuster rules, use of earmarks, and senatorial “holds” on judicial nominees. Read Joe Sestak’s response.  Pat Toomey (R) did not respond.

The Arc of PA: The outlook for human services is not particularly positive. With respect to intellectual disabilities, we can thank the Arc of PA for their candidate questionnaire.  Pennsylvania’s Gubernatorial and US Senate candidates were asked their positions on the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), adult protective services (APS), access to affordable health care for those with pre-existing conditions, the Community Choice Act, and a number of other issues. Read the Arc of PA’s candidate questionnaire and responses [12.57 MB pdf].  There was no response from US Senate candidate [NOW SENATOR-ELECT] Pat Toomey.

David A. Ross and Associates: On October 18, David A. Ross of David A. Ross and Associates asked Joe Sestak (D), Pat Toomey (R), Tom Corbett (R) and Dan Onorato (D), if elected, in what three ways would you partner with and strengthen Pennsylvania’s manufacturing, tourism, and nonprofit sectors, to achieve your campaign goals and to improve the quality of life in Pennsylvania.  Read “Three Questions for Pennsylvania’s Candidates”. While the candidates were unresponsive to the questionnaire, they were quick to integrate some of these themes into their own campaign rhetoric. As you read the questions, ask yourself whether the candidates truly have a plan to implement their positions and make good on their promises. Without a specific plan, and stakeholder support, their promises are just empty rhetoric.

Here are some of the ISSUES and influences in this election:

The economy: The effects of the global recession are far from over. The US budget deficit (not even the federal debt) has is now topped $30 billion per day. 15 millions Americans remain unemployed and their situation will not improve any time soon. 8 million of those jobs will never return according to the Vice-President Joe Biden. Over 400,000 Americans are losing their job every month, and the president is calling for Americans to stay the course. The economy grew at only 2% in the past 3 months and at 1.7% for the 3 months prior. It would take a 5% growth rate for a year to lower the jobless rate by 1%. The US jobless rate is nearly 10%.  DO THE MATH. It will take 5 years to recover. Unemployment lasts 26 to 52 weeks, sometimes more, sometimes less, but at half to a third of a person’s salary.  That is not enough to feed a family, and their unemployment will expire before they find work.  What is Congress and the Administration doing to restore jobs? Precious little. And even less with respect to restoring American manufacturing. Every man, woman and child in America sends $3 to China every day. It’s called our trade deficit and it has been growing for nearly two decades.  During that time, America has shipped its factories, its wealth and its economy to China in exchange for cheap consumer goods. Now China is growing by an unparalleled 9% to 11% each year, while the US struggles with barely 2% economic growth and near double-digit unemployment. THIS PROBLEM MUST BE RESOLVED before it’s too late.

Foreign Policy & National Security: The single largest problem America has is China. China is on its way to becoming the wealthiest superpower in the world by 2015. You may not care about titles, but with this title goes military supremacy. Since 2009, China has increased its military spending by 7.5%, investing in nuclear weapons, long-range missiles, submarines, aircraft carriers and cyber warfare. China can now strike as far as the US territory of Guam, and challenge US aircraft carriers in the South China Sea. China’s economic boom has given the country the means to challenge the US on Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan. A strong US military with unmatched technology is critical to global stability not to mention America’s very survival. Our technology will no longer be unmatched however, if China becomes wealthier. What they can’t invent, they can buy or spy. So how does the Administration plans to stem the flow of US factories, jobs and wealth to China before China becomes the next economic superpower and engages us in an arms race that we can’t afford to match?  See Jos Sestak’s speech on  foreign policy (10/4/10).

Good Government: Organizations like Common Cause of Pennsylvania focus on “good government” issues. From voter registration to counting and recording the votes, Common Cause PA is working to ensure that PA elections are more reliable and more voter-friendly. That means easier voter registration, no-fault absentee ballots, election day registration, curb-side voting for the disabled, early voting, better training for poll workers, better ballot access opportunities for independents and minor parties, and penalties for acts of voter intimidation. Unfortunately, the effects of the global recession are far from over and “good government” issues are taking a back seat to more immediate economic concerns. But how government proceeds and the solutions they chose, has as much to do with the process by which government operates as it does with feasibility of the policies they chose.

Redistricting: Bear in mind that election will have far-reaching consequences for the political rights of every Pennsylvanian. The party that gains control of Pennsylvania’s State Legislature, will control (among other things) the redrawing of Congressional districts (for their own advantage) and have an advantage in drawing lines for legislative seats. In other words, whoever draws the district lines, may determine who your State legislator will be, or at the very least, which party will dominate your community for the next decade.

Voter Intimidation: Pennsylvania has no specific law making voter intimidation illegal. If you have a question about your voter registration or poling place, or if you think someone has given you false information, threatens you, or tries to stop you from voting, call the LIVE, nationwide ELECTION PROTECTION HOTLINE, toll-free at 1-866-OUR-VOTE (866-687-8683) or visit them online at http://www.866OurVote.org. Trained volunteers will be standing by to help you from 6:00am until the polls close at 8:00pm. It’s free, it’s nonpartisan and it’s confidential. Watch the Election Protection Hotline video. Voting is more than just a right, it’s a responsibility. So vote on November 2.  Help others get to the polls. Talk to your family about voting.  It’s critical that the voices of all Americans – including yours – be heard at the polls.  For other voting issues, visit the PA Department of State website, or VotesPA.com for a list of county contacts and county web sites or to locate your polling place. See Common Cause of PA’s ELECTION PROTECTION webpage.

Money and politics: Who was responsible for the negative campaigns. The candidates and independent groups or PACs. The landmark (or “landfill“, depending upon how you view it) US Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC (1/21/10) opened the floodgates on corporate money being used to fund political campaigns. Now large sums of previously prohibited dollars are being funneled through advocacy groups and trade associations who are not directly affiliated with the candidates in order to influence elections. Corporations are now free to pay for political advertisements — now considered “genuine issue advocacy” — so long as the funding is disclosed.  Citizens United is the “Roe v. Wade” of election law.  Scholars will be measuring its impact and debating its merits for years to come. Other funding issues are skewing Pennsylvania politics too. Pennsylvania legislators and candidates alike have received tremendous sums of money from the Natural Gas drilling industry. Read “Deep Drilling Deep Pockets” a report on the campaign contributions and lobbying expenditures of the natural gas industry in Pennsylvania, by Common Cause of PA.  visit MarcellusMoney.org for contributions to individual candidates.  According to Common Cause, this year’s $4 billion election was the most expensive in US history.  In the words of Common Cause’s new  National chairman, “we’ve never seen in American history as much money flowing to our nation’s capital. [ ] there are hundreds of millions of dollars flowing to candidates and we have no way of knowing who is providing this money at all.  [ ] when you have that much money, it is inevitably influencing, if not bribing, if not corrupting politics, [ ] people back home say to themselves: government does not work.”

Final word on “Good Government”:  Neither party has a monopoly on how best to run the myriad of government agencies that serve Pennsylvanians. Good government issues trascends partisan politics.  On this at least, we must all agree.

Other influences: President Obama as leader of the Democratic party got off to a slow start this year in supporting Democrat candidates nationwide, and in promoting the relative success of his programs, stimulus, bailouts, and their effect on America’s economic “recovery” (if there is a recovery). This may contribute as much to whether Democrats lose control in Washington and Harrisburg as the coat-tail effect itself.  Weather plays an important role in voter turnout, especially in heavily Democratic Philadelphia, where urban voters generally walk to their polling places. The weather (11/2/2010) was perfect, sunny and seasonally mild.  If anything depresses voter turnout it will have been the negative campaigns advertisements. Such brutal half-truths filing the airwaves may offer short-term gains, but undermine a winning candidate’s ability to govern after the dust settled. After this election, image repair will be needed by the President and many winning candidates.

Considering the candidates, the issues, the economy, and the general climate, the November 2, 2010 Midterm election promises nothing less than fireworks. 

Pennsylvania needs enlightened leaders who are fair, open, and honest with the Legislature and with the electorate, and who build bridges with organizations to improve the quality of life for everyone– not just for their supporters. At the same time, we need avid citizen watchdogs to expose abusive practices of awarding sweetheart deals and tax incentives to cronies and campaign contributors. If those who win Tuesday’s election continue the “old ways” of running the state (gamesmanship, cronyism, and graft), then nothing will change regardless which party is in power.  Given Pennsylvania’s disastrous economy, joblessness, poverty, hunger and a multi-billion dollar state budget deficit, PA can not afford to return to the old ways of doing business.

–by David A. Ross, J.D.

Advertisements

THREE QUESTIONS FOR PENNSYLVANIA’S CANDIDATES

The Scranton Times Tribune ran a news story today (10/18/10) entitled “Nonprofits fear winter coupled with high unemployment.” Leaders of nonprofits and charities in Northeast Pennsylvania announced that the coming winter coupled with growing unemployment will push the limits of their organizations. That they lack money and capacity to meet the needs of their communities is not a matter of poor management. These are sophisticated organizations. It’s the economy. Pennsylvania’s social safety net is in serious jeopardy, because unemployment is rising, new jobs are not being created, and personal wealth is barely growing for Pennsylvanians- if at all.

2010 is a critical election year in Pennsylvania. Our Governor, Lieutenant Governor, 26 State Senators, and all 203 State Representatives are up for election, as well as Pennsylvania’s 19 Congressional seats. At stake is nothing less than majority control in Harrisburg and perhaps in Washington too. At the top of ticket, Pennsylvania is a battleground for the US Senate seat formerly held by Arlen Specter. The two candidates are Joe Sestak (D) and Pat Toomey (R) and by some accounts, are racing neck-and-neck.

With only 9 days until the November 2 general election, Pennsylvanians have decisions to make — big decisions with big consequences. Whether the issue is the economy, foreign trade, the social safety net, or campaign finance reform, the candidates have positions. Some have posted their positions on their websites; others have not. One thing they all have in common. They have not provided details on HOW THEY PLAN TO ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS. Without a plan, their goals are just empty campaign promises. So the real question is…. IF YOU ASK THEM HOW THEY PLAN TO ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, WILL THEY TELL YOU?

That’s exactly what I did. I asked them. I have spent the past 6 years identifying socio-economic problems, and working with partners (building coalitions) to develop solutions and implement those solutions. Drawing from this experience, I drafted the three questions pasted below. I have shared it with them and will continue to share it with as many people as is possible… until I get a response. Then I will post their responses so we will all know whether they really have a plan or whether it’s all hype.

SO PLEASE READ THE THREE QUESTIONS BELOW. Feel free to SEND THE QUESTIONS TO YOUR LAWMAKERS. Between tourism, nonprofits and manufacturing, we can identify solutions to improve one-third of Pennsylvania’s economy– or at least know where the candidates stand.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(1) MANUFACTURING SECTOR

In 2008, manufacturing accounted for 14% of the Pennsylvania’s total GDP (down from 21% in 1997). In 2009, manufactured goods accounted for more than 90% of Pennsylvania’s exports (down from 95% in 2002). China is our third largest export market (up from 16th in 1999). Currently, manufacturing accounts for just 10% of Pennsylvania’s total workforce (down 40% since 1990). During this same time (20 years), overall nonfarm employment in PA increased by 8%.

Some say it would be impossible to restore Pennsylvania’s manufacturing capacity. Others say that if we do not rebuild our factories, Pennsylvania’s economy will never recover. Considering that 600,000 Pennsylvanians are unemployed, I believe that restoring Pennsylvania’s factories is critical to Pennsylvania’s future.

America needs a comprehensive plan to rebuild our domestic manufacturing capacity, starting here in Pennsylvania, and starting today. American manufacturing is critical to the long-term health of our economy, to the welfare of our people, and ultimately to the survival of our nation.

Q1: If elected to the US Senate, in what three (3) specific ways would you partner with the manufacturing sector to prevent the loss of skilled manufacturing jobs in Pennsylvania and attract new skilled manufacturing jobs to Pennsylvania?

(2) NONPROFIT SECTOR

Pennsylvania is home to nearly 58,000 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit organizations. From hospitals, colleges, daycare centers and clinics, to soup kitchens, social service providers and foundations, Pennsylvania’s nonprofit sector employs about 600,000 FTE workers (or 11% of the workforce in PA). Together these workers earned over $21.1 billion in wages in 2003 (or 10% percent of total wages paid in Pennsylvania). For many communities, nonprofits are also an economic engine for growth and development.

Since the recession began however, Pennsylvania’s nonprofits are facing declining contributions, decreasing revenue, and losses of government and foundation funding. Resources are dwindling, but the community’s need for the services that nonprofits provide continues to grow.

Q2: If elected to the US Senate, in what three (3) specific ways would you partner with and strengthen the nonprofit sector to achieve the goals of your campaign and improve the quality of life in our Commonwealth?

(3) TRAVEL, TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY

Pennsylvania tourism is the state’s second-largest industry. Together, PA hotels, amusement parks, restaurants, ski areas, stadiums, and attractions of all types, generate $28 billion in revenue each year and pay $10 billion in wages and benefits to over 400,000 workers (or about 7% of Pennsylvania’s workforce). While these are certainly impressive numbers, tourism in Pennsylvania has room to grow. Understanding what motivates people to visit PA or employers to relocate to PA, and coordinating economic development to enhance PA tourism would improve Pennsylvania’s business climate over the long term.

Q3: If elected to the US Senate, in what three (3) specific ways would you partner with the tourism industry to improve economic growth and development?

Is the Wall Street Journal Reading Your Blog? Is Obama Losing Control of the Economy?

Is the Wall Street Journal Reading Your Blog?

Last week (8/13/10) David A. Ross, J.D. posted on Facebook the following “In the 1980’s, economists said that if you want to live in a country where parents have no illusions that their children will be better-off than they were, move to England. Today, England’s future is brighter with the EU. Not so for America. Ask yourself whether your children will have it better than you did? Now ask why, and what can be done about it?” The rest of my article went on to mention how America incorrectly measured the strength of the Chinese economy.

In yesterday’s (8/16/10) Wall Street Journal, Mort Zuckerman wrote “With a historically weak recovery and high unemployment rate, we hear people beginning to question the long-held assumption that their children will have it better than they.” The rest of his article went on to address the problems in the US economy.

Just remember, on the issue of American optimism, you heard it here first.

Now I ask the question: Is Obama Losing Control of the Economy?

Here are the highlights of Zuckerman’s very astute article The End of American Optimism:

1) Obama’s Broken Promise: The Obama administration’s projection that the unemployment rate will drop to 8.7% by the end of next year and 6.8% by 2013 is totally unrealistic. The economy would have to add nearly 300,000 jobs each month over the next three years to make up the 2.5 million jobs that the Obama administration promised, thereby returning the unemployment rate to under 8%. “At the rate we are going, it will take from six to nine years to climb out of this hole.”

2) Nearly No New Jobs Were Created: The Obama administration created virtually no new jobs this year. The 600,000 jobs supposedly created do not exist. They were a mathematical error caused last year by economic modeling that assumed a steady rate of new businesses creating new jobs. 550,000 of these phantom jobs were kept on the books at the US Department of Labor since April of this year. The Administration is playing with the numbers.

3) Real Unemployment is Higher: Real unemployment today is well above the reported 9.5%. That number held steady only because over a million people gave up hope of finding work and left the labor force within the past three months. Taking that into account, the unemployment rate is actually 10.4%.

4) Long Term Unemployment Persists: There are at least 14.5 million Americans still searching for work: 1.4 million of them have been jobless for more than 99 weeks, 6.5 million have been jobless for over 27 weeks. And there is little hope of ever restoring those jobs.

5) Traditional Fixes Aren’t Working: “Tons of money have been shoveled in to rescue reckless banks and fill the huge hole in the economy, but nothing is working the way it normally had in all our previous crises.” The Administration has tried encouraging people to buy cars, homes, weatherization kits, and even solar panels, yet the economy limps along at a nearly 2.4% growth rate (which is just above inflation).

6) Welcome to the New Normal: “We are in what a number of economists are referring to as the ‘new normal.'” The current recession could last indefinitely, because there have been NO FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES to the underlying economy.

CONCLUSION: At this point, I am thoroughly convinced that President Barack Obama has lost control of the American economy, has not a clue of what to do next, and fails to appreciate the urgency by which solutions must be found. While the administration waits out the storm, the storm is growing worse, day… by day… by day. And by now, President Obama’s advisors are probably telling him that he needs a foreign war to distract the American public’s attention from our disastrous domestic economy. Again, it has always worked in the past, but it will not work this time. America is facing a major crisis, but there is no sense of urgency in the White House.

Federal Unemployment Extension Bill on Track for Passage

The American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010 (H.R.4213) passed the U.S. Senate yesterday (Tuesday, 7/20/10) by a vote of 60-40 just enough to overcome the Republican filibuster threat extending unemployment benefits for 2.5 million jobless Americans. The bill now goes back to the House for approval before it can be sent to the President for approval.

 The cost of the bill is estimated at $34 billion, less than half of the original $200 billion price tag, and as much as 70% being paid with offsets.

While the bill has many provisions to close tax loopholes affecting wealthy individuals and corporations, the bill extends for three month the closing deadline for first-time homebuyers looking to get the $8,000 tax credit, and also extends charitable tax incentives we lobbied for under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, such as the IRA rollover (sec.226) and the enhanced charitable deductions for contributions of food (sec.251), books (sec.252) or computers (sec.253).

H.R.4213.EAH would extend benefits for the next three months (until November) retroactive to the first week of June. What’s missing? The $25 per week Federal Additional Compensation (FAC) stimulus is missing, as is an extension of COBRA health insurance. It also includes drastic reductions in Medicaid, Medicare, and Tricare. All of this of course impact families that are already struggling to find gainful employment. American families are facing a crisis not witnessed in decades, joblessness, homelessness, lack of medical care, and even hunger. In Philadelphia at least, one third of those going hungry are children.

Extension of unemployment benefits is a critical step, but it is only the first step. This would be the eighth extension of unemployment benefits since July 2008, at a total cost of over $120 billion. WHERE IS THE PLAN TO FIX THE ECONOMY? Where is the plan to work with business and nonprofits to grow the workforce with well-paying jobs upon which a person can build a family?

–David A. Ross, J.D.

—————————————————-

Read more at:

(7/21/10) Unemployment benefits extension comes with mixed views, concerns, by David Bodenheimer, The Dispatch (Lexington, NC) http://www.the-dispatch.com/article/20100721/articles/100729982&tc=yahoo?tc=ar

(7/20/10) Filibuster broken, jobless benefits may flow soon. By a single vote, jobless benefits extension clears Senate hurdle, setting stage for passage, by Andrew Taylor, Associated Press. “The recovery from the nation’s long and deep recession has produced relatively few new jobs so far, and millions of people’s unemployment benefits began running out seven weeks ago as Congress bogged down in an impasse over whether the $34 billion cost of a fresh extension of benefits should be paid for with budget cuts or be added to the $13 trillion national debt.” http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Filibuster-broken-jobless-apf-1521010382.html?x=0&.v=24

(6/28/10) H.R. 4213 American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act | What’s Left, World news Vine. http://worldnewsvine.com/2010/06/h-r-4213-american-jobs-and-closing-tax-loopholes-act-whats-left/

Corbett Retracts Prior Statement That Unemployed Would Rather Collect Benefits Than Work

 
In response to public outrage and chiding from his opponent, gubernatorial candidate Tom Corbett reversed his prior statement where he had blamed unemployed Pennsylvanian’s for being jobless. Read the original article at http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-pennsylvania-corbett-unemployment-20100709,0,4903822.story
 
Claiming that the unemployed would rather collect unemployment benefits than work, because minimum wage jobs remain unfilled is foolish for a gubernatorial candidate, especially given the current economic climate. Not only does it incense the electorate, but it builds intense mistrust. With a 9.1% unemployment rate in Pennsylvania, virtually every person in PA has a family member who is unemployed, knows someone who is unemployed, or is concerned about losing his or her own job. But good jobs are few and far between these days. According to Vice President Biden, “there’s no possibility to restore 8 million jobs lost in the Great Recession.” http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20008924-503544.html
 
If Corbett should become the next Governor of PA, it would be his job to attract new employers to PA, prevent existing PA employers from leaving, and add good job with decent wages. After all, not all jobs are created equal. A family of 4 can not live on one minimum wage job, and few minimum wage jobs provide health care coverage. As for unemployment benefits being an incentive not to work, if you think that $310 per week is an adequate incentive, I welcome you to try making ends meet on $7.75 per hour, before taxes, and not including health care (which is about $500 per month).   
 
According to Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato, (Democratic candidate for PA Governor), Attorney General Corbett’s statement that jobless benefits lead some workers to choose unemployment shows that Corbett “simply doesn’t get it.” If you visited Onorato’s website at http://www.voteonorato.com/?no_splash=1, you would think that jobs were his top priority.
  
According to the Corbett Campaign, however, “Corbett has shown his commitment to turning the economic tides in PA, by developing detailed plans for reforming the state’s job climate, increasing job opportunity and putting Pennsylvanians back to work.” Check out Corbett’s reform package and you decide whether his proposals will help average Pennsylvanians by putting them back to work, or preventing them from losing their job in the first place. http://www.tomcorbettforgovernor.com/reforming-pennsylvania%E2%80%99s-jobs-climate. 
 
Corbett has since publicly apologized for his insensitive remark. He even claimed that he was merely relating the words of someone else, but the damage is already done. Now, he must win back the electorate by regaining their trust, which takes time, and lots of it.

  

 Pundits still put Corbett ahead of Onorato by as much as 10 points in the polls. For the past 8 months, the catch-phrase for the PA Governor’s race has been “It’s Corbett’s to lose”. The Corbett’s campaign is blaming the Onorato’s campaign and the Harrisburg Patriot News for fueling the fire.  The Onorato campaign certainly has benefited from Corbett’s gaff (if it was in fact a gaff).  Maybe we have all benefited from Corbett’s misstatement. Both campaigns are now refocused on finding solutions to substantive issues like unemployment, job creation, job retention and Pennsylvania’s economy. 

 —-  David A. Ross, J.D.
_____________________________________________________________
Additional Articles:
 
(7/20/10) Tom Corbett chalks up criticism over unemployment remarks to negative campaigning by Dan Onorato , by Kari Andren, The Patriot-News (Harrisburg, PA) http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/07/tom_corbett_chalks_up_criticis.html#incart_mce 

(7/20/10) Gov. Ed Rendell blasts GOP gubernatorial hopeful Tom Corbett for his unemployment remarks, by Kari Andren, The Patriot-News (Harrisburg, PA) http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/07/gov_ed_rendell_blasts_gop_gube.html#incart_mce

%d bloggers like this: